http://stardrive.org/stardrive/index.php/blog/jim-woodward-s-star-ship-engine-mach-effect-thruster.html Woodward's Star Ship Engine Idea

http://stardrive.org/stardrive/index.php/blog/is-gerard-t-hooft-right-and-seth-lloyd-wrong-about-tim... time travel to the past

http://stardrive.org/stardrive/index.php/blog/advances-in-dark-energy-back-from-the-future-hologram-world-cosmology.html world hologram

http://stardrive.org/stardrive/index.php/blog/quantum-theory-and-biology.html quantum theory, life & consciousness

http://stardrive.org/stardrive/index.php/blog/hacking-the-cosmic-code-mind-of-god.html hacking the cosmic code

http://stardrive.org/stardrive/index.php/blog/hot-physics-discussions-on-facebook-june-25-2013-part-1.html  physics discussions on Facebook

https://www.facebook.com/jack.sarfatti  daily science news updates that I think are important

http://tinyurl.com/k9wvs8w Gerard 't Hooft's "Greatest Blunders"?

Gerard 't Hooft's TWO greatest blunders? S-Matrix & Rejection of...

stardrive.org

The thin sheet of reality of the hologram universe is the brane of Hawking's Mind of God. ;-) Destiny 1) S-Matrix? S-Matrix is an input-output black box model for scattering of simple beams of non-interacting particles (ensembles) on similar...

http://tinyurl.com/lgnopul  when is the destiny matrix hologram we are inside of?

Jack Sarfatti my review of Lenny Susskinds hologram universe video http://lnkd.in/xV67JA

My youtube review of Lenny Susskind's excellent video lecture on...

stardrive.org

The question Lenny should have asked in that lecture is whether we are 3D images whose information is scrambled all over our past and future 2D horizons relative to observers outside them in the multiverse? Leonard Susskind on The World As...

http://stardrive.org/stardrive/index.php/blog/a-crisis-for-bohm-s-version-of-quantum-theory.html

http://tinyurl.com/mv2xt57  Antony Valentini says Bohm's quantum dynamics is unstable

http://lnkd.in/vhwQJ6 time travel to the past in physics today Zielinski's report on time travel to the past in modern physics

http://stardrive.org/stardrive/index.php/blog/nick-s-review-of-the-kalamidas-affair-june-5-2013.html

http://stardrive.org/stardrive/index.php/blog/back-from-the-future-destiny-physics-in-modern-cosmology.html

Begin forwarded message:

From: Suda Martin <Martin.Suda.fl@ait.ac.at>
Subject: AW: The end of the problem, hopefully
Date: June 3, 2013 11:10:24 AM PDT
To: John Howell <howell@pas.rochester.edu>, Demetrios Kalamidas <dakalamidas@sci.ccny.cuny.edu>
Cc: nick herbert <quanta@cruzio.com>, JACK SARFATTI <adastra1@me.com>, Ruth Elinor Kastner <rekastner@hotmail.com>, "Romano rromano@iastate.edu [MATH]" <rromano@iastate.edu>, David Kaiser <dikaiser@mit.edu>, S-P Sirag <sirag@mindspring.com>, Brian Josephson <bdj10@cam.ac.uk>, Fred Wolf <questions@fredalanwolf.com>

Thanks, John, for "Full calculation, no approximation". Somewhere the phase exp(i Phi) is missing in Eq.(2)? And you forgot perhaps the different adjustments of 1,0 and 0,1 in Eq.(2)? But I am sure the results are the same as in Eqs.(3) and (4). Great!
Martin

________________________________________
Von: John Howell [howell@pas.rochester.edu]
Gesendet: Montag, 3. Juni 2013 19:43
An: Demetrios Kalamidas
Cc: nick herbert; ghirardi; JACK SARFATTI; CHRISTOPHER GERRY; John Howell; Suda Martin; Ruth Elinor Kastner; Romano rromano@iastate.edu [MATH]; David Kaiser; S-P Sirag; Brian Josephson; Fred Wolf
Betreff: The end of the problem, hopefully

Hello Everyone,
  I just have a few comments

1) I think we should respect Giancarlo's and Chris's desire to decouple
from this conversation.  So, I think they should not be copied in on
further emails.

2) I have done the full calculation without any approximations, expansions
etc. for the PACS and DFS, and as expected, there is no interference. I
have already shown the DFS, so the PACS is Attached.

3) The second order cross correlation for the evolution of the field
operators vs the Suda state evolution yield different results.  I need to
double check my answers (long calculation).

4) I like Chris's approach, which is basically to consider a binomially
distributed photon number outcome interfering with a photon from the other
port.  That will take me a while, but it should corroborate the Suda's
state evolution paper.

Cheers
John

http://stardrive.org/stardrive/index.php/blog/kalamidas-update-june-3-2013-v1.html